- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:55:36 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:48:22 +0200, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 8/13/10 10:14 AM): >> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-type-scroll -- in my >> limited testing for specifying this event as part of CSSOM View I found >> that it simply uses the Event interface (not UIEvent) > > It is a UI Event, so we believed it would be better placed there; the > implementation difference it trivial, and we didn't think moving it > would negatively affect legacy content. If you have evidence otherwise, > and the group agrees that's better, I could move it back to the basic > Event interface. What is the advantage? As .detail means nothing and .view is useless. Just seems like additional complexity for no reason. >> and does bubble >> when dispatched on the Document object (to Window, and bubbles is true). > > Simon Pieters indicated that it does not bubble [1], and testing seemed > to bear that out. > > Is this a special case for the scroll event on the Document object? > Could you share your tests with us? > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2009JulSep/0025.html It works differently for the Document object, yes. (I don't have anything I can share in test form at this point.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 28 August 2010 17:56:11 UTC