- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:05:14 -0400
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Web Applications Working Group Teleconference
25 Aug 2010
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2010/08/25-webapps-irc
Attendees
Present
[Microsoft], Shepazu, Olli_Pettay
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
Travis
Contents
* [3]Topics
* [4]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 25 August 2010
<smaug_> shepazu: we have the meeting?
<smaug_> and sorry, I'm a bit late
<scribe> scribe: Travis
<scribe> scribeNick: Travis
Hi, and welcome.
shepazu: I know of two outstanding issues
... 1) ContextInfo sections need to be checked and fixed if
necessary
... 2) composition events implementation feedback
... other than that, I think we're ready to publish.
... I expect there will be feedback that we'll need integrate after
last call, and possibly a second last call.
... but we can take these comments and integrate them.
smaug_: We had talked earlier about publishing a WD first, then
issuing the Last Call
shepazu: Yes, we could that because WD get better review than
editor's draft.
smaug_: I see in many bugs, that people are looking at the last
(outdated) WD.
shepazu: It would be ideal to go from WD to LastCall, but to get
this shipped it makes sense to go straight there.
... we should have been pushing every three months, but haven't kept
up.
... I will ask the working group to go to last call, with certain
known issues, and the expectation that we will take last-call
comments seriously.
smaug_: How are last call comments different from WD comments?
shepazu: Last call comments need to be tracked and resolved by the
group. We have to ensure that we close the loop on commenters.
... We understand that there are potential (old) issues, that we'd
like to make official last call comments.
... Timing is a factor here too, relative to Doug's upcoming
schedule.
... We want to make sure we collect the comments.
... We will probably have a second last call (shorter) becuase
hopefully we have addressed all the issues.
<scribe> ACTION: shepazu to update composition events and
contextinfo sections before this Friday (8/27/2010) [recorded in
[5]http://www.w3.org/2010/08/25-webapps-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-571 - Update composition events and
contextinfo sections before this Friday (8/27/2010) [on Doug
Schepers - due 2010-09-01].
<scribe> ACTION: shepazu to request Last Call transition from the
Web Apps Working Group [recorded in
[6]http://www.w3.org/2010/08/25-webapps-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-572 - Request Last Call transition from
the Web Apps Working Group [on Doug Schepers - due 2010-09-01].
shepazu: I added a definition for event order and a section that
relates to event loops.
Travis: That section looks good to me.
smaug_: The event loop does not seem relevant to the DOM Events spec
... We should be careful that we don't imply that the event loop
concept is a DOM Events spec feature.
shepazu: Are there any other outstanding issues that need to be
addressed (other than the two aforementioned ones)?
Travis: None. I expect we'll have a few last call comments
smaug_: No
<shepazu> trackbot: end telcon
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: shepazu to request Last Call transition from the Web
Apps Working Group [recorded in
[7]http://www.w3.org/2010/08/25-webapps-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: shepazu to update composition events and contextinfo
sections before this Friday (8/27/2010) [recorded in
[8]http://www.w3.org/2010/08/25-webapps-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 19:05:16 UTC