- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:27:01 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:55:07 +0200, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >>> You might have meant the character value. We have already decided that >>> the character value (if it exists) will be the attribute value. >> >> So we will not have strings in the form of "U+xxxx" anymore? > > Please read the spec. I did. I don't understand why "U+xxxx" is still there so I was wondering if that was temporary. >> That functionality seems to apply to charcter handling everywhere and is >> not at all specific to event handling so I think it would be >> inappropriate for the events specification. > > You may misunderstand what the DocumentEvent interface is for. It would be nice if you simply assumed that I did and went on from there. > It's intended to extend the Document interface with methods and > attributes that are applicable to features defined in the events > specification, even if they don't directly deal with events. This is new then since you took over editing. Before that it only dealt with events. > It deals directly with key identifiers and the key identifiers set (for > example, there are also named values, not just various representations > of the Unicode code points), so it's not just general character > handling. I don't want to cripple authors because of misgivings about > architectural purity... I don't understand why we cannot have a single list and rather need to have various identifiers for everything. > this is a directly related to DOM3 Events key identifiers, and it needs > to be implemented in that context. Mozilla and Microsoft have already > agreed that we need this, BTW. Well, I disagree. I do not see the point in having this method as I do not see the need for having multiple representations for everything in the first place in the context of DOM Level 3 Events. Furthermore I think putting createEvent on Document was a mistake in to begin with. Especially with the design we have now where DOM events are often used outside the context of documents. (Think of e.g. Web Workers.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 16:27:42 UTC