- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:34:00 -0400
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Hi, Sean- Sean Hogan wrote (on 9/22/09 12:13 AM): > > Doug Schepers wrote: >> >> Here are some counter-proposals, in roughly descending order of my >> preference: >> 1) keyname (I'd need to come up with some other term for what I'm >> calling a "key name" in the spec, but that's fine) >> 2) keystring >> 3) keyvalue >> 4) keyaddress >> 5) keyid (I don't like this one for a number of reasons) >> 6) keypeek (joke) >> > The XBL spec uses "key" for event filtering. Seems okay to me. Too general. When you're describing the feature, you need a more specific hook. Just saying "key" doesn't distinguish it from a physical key, keyCode/charCode, a VK, or even a scancode. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 04:34:10 UTC