- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:05:56 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >> Hi, Alex- >> >> I've tentatively added the 'listen()' and 'unlisten()' methods as syntactic >> sugar shorthands for 'addEventListener()' and 'removeEventListener()'. >> Obviously, this assumes that the implementers have no objections, and are >> willing to implement these methods. > > For what it's worth, I would rather not implement these new methods in > Firefox, for the following reasons: > > 1. As far as I can tell it has not been shown that the developer > community at large sees the long name as a significant problem. It is the first I have heard that complaint. Regarding long names, I have heard complaint about: * document.getElementById * document.getComputedStyle(el, "").getPropertyValue(p); > 2. If the long name is a significant problem, then it can easily be > worked around in JS by using prototypes. As far as I know no library I stated in another thread that modifying host object prototypes is not cross browser and doesn't work cross-frame. It is also not standard. The practice has been the source of problems in Prototype.js but that hasn't stopped Mootools developers from making the same mistake. > does this, further indicating that this isn't something that > developers find to be a bug burden. (In fact, if we should 'rename' > any method, it would be to rename 'document.getElementById' to '$'). You can't be serious. Do you have any idea how many sites that would break? > 3. There's a better suggestion in this thread for how to get rid of > the extra argument; simply mark it [optional]. How would a program determine if the extra argument were optional or not? And if it could, it is still pointless. Consider:- if(isUseCaptureOptional()) { node.addEventListener("click", cb); } else { node.addEventListener("click", cb, false); } I hope you can see the humor in that. If Events is to be redesigned, then specific problems need to be drawn. I have identified two so far and mentioned them in another thread. Again, they are:- 1) No good way to determine if an object /generates/ an event. 2) Creating and dispatching events is painful and the API is not easily extensible. I've addressed those as proposals that fit my criteria for new proposals: 1) feature detectible 2) a fallback strategy can be provided Garrett
Received on Sunday, 13 September 2009 02:06:38 UTC