- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:48:24 -0400
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Hi, Garrett- Thanks for your comments. I was specifically asking for review of the wording for the mouseover, mouseout, mouseenter, and mouseleave events, so other comments should go on a different thread (thus the change in subject line). Garrett Smith wrote (on 9/10/09 6:20 PM): > > | To create an instance of the MouseEvent interface, > | use the DocumentEvent.createEvent("MouseEvent") method call. > > The code would be functional if it were to call |createEvent| on an > *instance* of DocumentEvent, and that could be marked up as: > > <code><var>document</var>.createEvent("MouseEvent");</code> Okay, I'll take this under advisement. > | Note: When initializing MouseEvent objects using initMouseEvent > | or initMouseEventNS, implementations should use the client > | coordinates clientX and clientY for calculation of other > | coordinates (such as target coordinates exposed by DOM Level 0 > | implementations). > > Add: > > | ... (such as target coordinates exposed by DOM Level 0 > | implementations or other proprietary properties e.g.|pageX|). Noted. > I had thought that |canDispatch| was out and I agreed with removing > it. What is the reason for it? It's marked at risk. I want to get wider feedback from reviews of the public Working Draft before I actually remove the text. This spec has been available as a W3C Note for over 7 years, so I want to make sure we aren't tripping anyone up too much. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 22:48:33 UTC