- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:49:50 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: www-dom@w3.org
Hi, Folks- Sorry, I've been working on the spec, but I've been having a really frustrating time, and I've got some more urgent things I need to take care of this week. I don't think it would be worth holding a telcon this week, based on my progress thus far. I'd like to ask that we put off the telcon one more week. I'll have a new revision checked in by this Friday, to give everyone time to review it. I'm hoping we can make more progress with a substantive spec at hand. Apologies- -Doug Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 3/24/09 4:58 PM): > There will be a DOM 3 Events call on Wednesday (that's tomorrow where I > am now...) > > Logistics: > tel +1.617.761.6200 room 3661# ("DOM3"). > Time: Pacific 11.30am, Boston 2.30 pm (summer time). > 1830Z, 1930 CET, 2030 Helsinki > > Agenda: > 1. Identify scribe, confirm last minutes > > 2. Action item review. Due this week (or earlier): > ACTION-1[1] Find open issues and update the Spec - schepers > ACTION-6 [2] Add a diagram about wheel axes etc > ACTION-7 [3] Clarify default actions (section 1.3) > ACTION 312 [4] Propose langauge to resolve ISSUE-44 - schepers > ACTION 318 [5] Research what SVG does for load - schepers > ACTION 319 [6] Publish your findings about mutation event implementation > - Olli > ACTION 320 [7] Talk to people at Opera about mutation events - chaals > > 3. ISSUE-44 [8] (related to actions 312 and 318 above) > What should D3E say about the window object and where events are fired. > > 4. ISSUE-39 [9] (related to action 320 above) > Consider changing ordering/firing of mutation events? What should we do > about mutation events? Is it worth having ARIA-specific events (is that > a new issue)? > > 5. Publication schedule [10] > Doug hopes to make a new editor's draft available. That would mean that > there is something to review, and more issues may be raised on it if > people have had time. > > 6. Other overdue action items? [11] > > 7. Review of editor's draft > (This depends on having one, and people having had time to look at it). > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/1 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/6 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/7 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/312 > [5] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/318 > [6] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/319 > [7] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/320 > [8] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/44 > [9] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/39 > [10] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/321 > [11] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/2 > > cheers > > Chaals
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 09:50:05 UTC