- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:15:16 -0400
- To: "Emanuele D'Arrigo" <manu3d@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote: > I agree with you that's the path I've eventually decided to follow. It > should be said however that from an implementation point of view the > second method is not entirely infeasible and therein lies the minor > ambiguity I'm not sure what the ambiguity is. The DOM3 Events drafy clearly says: The target's ancestors are determined before the initial dispatch of the event. If the target node is removed during the dispatching, or a target's ancestor is added or removed, the event propagation will always be based on the target node and the target's ancestors determined before the dispatch. [1] DOM2 events has similar wording. What's ambiguous? -Boris [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-DOM-Level-3-Events-20031107/events.html#Events-phases the paragraph right after the "Note" about an SVG version of the image immediately above that being available.
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 22:15:59 UTC