W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2009

Fwd: RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:05:34 +0200
To: "DOM public list" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.us4c3kgkwxe0ny@widsith.local>
(forwarded from public-webapps - I will add the current replies from there  
to this thread)

------- Forwarded message -------
From: "Mike Wilson" <mikewse@hotmail.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:35:54 +0200

Following up on last year's discussion on adding support for
querying DOM elements about already registered event handlers:

Travis Leithead wrote on Apr 09, 2008; 08:07pm
> In considering a design for the event iterator (allow devs
> to enumerate what events have been _added_ via
> addEventListener to a given object), I looked at two general
> approaches:
> 1) Defining a new collection on every object that supports
> the EventTarget interface
> 2) Defining a 'getNextEvent' function for every object that
> supports the EventTarget interface
> 3) Defining a function that returns a static/dynamic list of
> event handlers for a given object that supports the
> EventTarget interface
<rest of conversation snipped>

Action page:

Mail thread view on nabble:

Was any consensus ever reached and what's the status of this
suggestion now?

Personally I think this feature is a very natural part of the
DOM API and believe there needs to be very good reasons not to
include it.

Best regards
Mike Wilson

Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 23:06:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:36:54 UTC