- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-dom@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:02:29 +1100
- To: www-dom@w3.org
Hi Ray. Ray Whitmer: > My own recent experience with Batik was very negative. When I edited > documents with inkscape and tried to get Batik to accept them, I had > to remove every xml namespace declaration and prefix use before I > could get it to work. I wouldn't therefore even count Batik until it > can parse XML documents with xml namespace declarations and usages of > xml:space, for example, in them (and I think there were other things > broken as well). I have no experience with ASV6. If you have specific examples of where you think Batik is broken could you please file a bug report or send mail to one of the mailing lists (or reply here) so it could be fixed, thanks. I haven't had any problems loading namespace well-formed documents in Batik. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ICQ: 26955922 cam (at) mcc.id.au MSN: cam (at) mcc.id.au http://mcc.id.au/ JBR: heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 05:02:41 UTC