- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:16:50 -0800
- To: Ray Whitmer <ray@personallegal.net>
- Cc: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, DOM mailing list <www-dom@w3.org>, andersca@mac.com
On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:34 AM, Ray Whitmer wrote: > > Can you tell me how many implementers of the standard would be made > retroactively incompatible by this sort of change to an intentional > part of DOM Level 1? I am not talking the major vendors current > implementations, but other and prior implementatiions? Please > enumerate those which will not be broken and let's see how many you > leave out. It is perhaps not as relevant to me as you would like it > to be that you personally do not care about these other > implementations which followed the standard. I have know list but > know of enough. Making either empty string or null an acceptable return value in this case will break 0 implementations. Can you name any that would be broken by making both behaviors conforming? I can't imagine how this is possible. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 2 December 2005 07:17:00 UTC