Re: A question on DOMException: Why is code defined as component instead of an attribute?

On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 22:15 -0300, ale@alejandrolapeyre.com.ar wrote:
> Looking at the normative xml file I see that the DOMException, code member is defined as a 
> <component>.
> 
> Why is code defined as <component> instead of <attribute> ?
> 
> What was/is the idea behind this?

After doing a quick search, I have no idea why it is defined as a
component, so I'll try to guess: it might be that IDL excluded
attributes in exceptions in the past.
Looking at the IDL specification, once can have attributes in an
exception, so I don't think there is a reason to have as a component
anymore.

Maybe someone with more IDL knowledge would help clarify this?

Philippe