- From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:37:21 +0000
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 16:19, Robin Berjon wrote: > Frans Englich wrote: > > I find it easy to find work inside W3C that needs to be done: whole > > specifications missing, extensions in specifications being abscent, test > > suites that needs completion, and so forth. Mostly the reaction is "Good > > Idea, Someone Should start a Working Group for that." After that passes a > > handful of years, with no clear answers on if anything will happen at > > all. > > The reason I mentionned such a group is that there's a chance that it > might get created in the close future and start work on precisely this > sort of API, I would expect in a fast-paced manner. While nothing is > settle at this point, I have reason to hope that it's not a "oooh, let's > create a WG for this" thing. > > > The questions that begs is, is the W3C bureaucracy justified? I can't > > answer if it fully is, but it surely is frustrating. > > In my experience the "bureaucracy" is quite limited. The major problem > I've found is that finding people to do actual work on specifications > and test suites is hard. Way too often WGs are short on workforce as too > few people can commit time to get things done. Yes, nothing is easy. My comment shouldn't been taken seriously, it was a silly, disillusioned whining in the name of frustration. My Apologies, Frans
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 11:27:42 UTC