- From: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:56:57 -0600
- To: www-dom@w3.org
>In that case, I agree that your proposal makes sense. But I have to ask: >Won't _any_ parser that's capable of "smart" parsing necessarily contain >a heavy dose of implementation-dependent features? It seems to me that >an application-specific DOM tree that doesn't actually do anything isn't >much more use than a generic DOM tree. > > When executing script in an XHTML page or SVG image, your only available parser might be the browser viewing the document and getting a generic DOM tree might be exactly what you want. However, without a configuration parameter, the implementation has no way of knowing that.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 00:56:55 UTC