- From: Christian Parpart <cparpart@surakware.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:59:15 +0100
- To: daniel@glazman.org
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org, ian@hixie.ch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 28 November 2003 6:06 pm, Daniel Glazman wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > Does the spec define what should happen with > > > > node.insertBefore(child, child) > > > > ...? > > > >>From my reading of the spec [1], what should happen is that first the > > > > child node should be removed ("If the newChild is already in the tree, it > > is first removed."), then a "NOT_FOUND_ERR" exception should be thrown, > > since the node is no longer in the tree and so can't be found. This is true from my point of view but not really usefull, just as you said. > > This isn't useful, and isn't what UAs appear to have implemented. Based > > on this testcase: > > > > http://hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/dom/core/007-demo.html > > > > ...Opera, Mozilla, IE6, and Safari all simply ignore the call, not > > changing the DOM and not raising any exceptions. Well, a blind spec implemented (damn, just like me) would provide the behavior just as the spec acutally specifies, but I now intent to raise a DOMException of type HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR since this is really a hierarchy request error. However, ignoring the methods function is really not the best behavior as the currently supporting browsers do so :( > > Could the spec be clarified to specify this interoperable behaviour? > > I understand perfectly the reasons behind your proposal but I hate thinking > of a spec allowing the concept "insert that before itself" without > complaining about an illegal request. After all, it does not mean "do > nothing", it really _means_ nothing at all. It's conceptually non-sense. I propose to clarify this as I said above. Regards, Christian Parpart. - -- 22:51:28 up 53 days, 8:48, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.03 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/x8U2Ppa2GmDVhK0RAu+nAJ4+Zn/otBDaZjxKiaL2ysG3K3b2/ACeKoGt sWWo+jfP6XCozWBMRlGSzTA= =YKPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 28 November 2003 16:59:24 UTC