- From: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:16:06 -0600
- To: www-dom@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/2003/06/09-dom-core-issues/issues.html
arnold-21: anonymous types
Satisified with omitting isAnonymous if that distinction is not
preserved in the PVSI.
isSimple (and additionally isId and isName) would be useful, but could
be accomplished with the provided functionality.
arnold-22: XML Schema and DTD types
From the last call issues list:
An application can always know the schema apply to the document by
checking the schema-type parameter of the configuration object, so
there is a way to distinguish them.
It is not clear (and possibly undesirable) that an implementation is
required to set the schema-type parameter based on the schema type
encounted when validating a document.
Could the typeNamespace value for DTD types be changed to
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml"? That would be consistent with the
schema-type DOMConfiguration parameter and would clearly distinguish
built-in DTD datatypes from user defined types in the null namespace.
arnold-23: nested and anonymous types
Satisified. This comment was due to an infamiliarity with "anonymous
type name".
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 12:16:07 UTC