Re: document.referrer, .cookie, .domain

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 12:12, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>Yes, that would indeed be great, especially as none of the alternative are any 
>>good (casting, proprietary, reinventing the wheel). The splitting out would seem 
>>to require minimal work and could be readily reused by other specs.
> 
> I have no objection of doing so and we could certainly add it on our
> wishes list:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/10/23-DOMOpenList

That would be nice.

> ... but that would require that the Working Group do produce work on a
> general "browser" interface, which we don't for the moment. Our current
> plans are to finish DOM Level 3 (which is really late on schedule) for
> the moment but, for the moment, we don't plan to produce more work after
> that.

Couldn't another WG take care of that? The DOM WG isn't the only one that deals 
with user agents.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 05:41:42 UTC