- From: Ray Whitmer <rayw@netscape.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:15:54 -0800
- To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- CC: www-dom@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Shelby Moore wrote: >At 08:08 PM 12/15/2002 -0800, Ray Whitmer wrote: > > >>I lead the effort to try to produce such a standard for what I believe >>you are requesting. Unfortunately, it did not have the backing of >>enough participants besides myself (not any that I can remember towards >>the end). >> >> > >Ray thanks for your reply. I just read (11pm CST) in more detail your DOM >Views and Formatting draft spec, which IS the general concept of what I am >requesting: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Views/views-formatting.html > >I wonder if one reason this spec did not garnish more interest is because >the spec may require a lot of work to implement. I think there may be a >much easier way to get the necessary generality. More on simplication below... > This was a very early first draft and would have undoubtedly migrated to some form that did not require too much implementation effort on the part of browser vendors. It was my opinion at the time that the model advocated would actually be quite trivial to wrap around existing implementations, but I was in no way in love with any aspect of the draft and would have happily yielded to anyone else wanting to take it in another direction or edit the specification. I would certainly favor something simple, abstract, and easy to get implementations of. I was new to Netscape at the time so I cannot say I had a perfect sense of Netscape's implementation, although I had the full support of Netscape development at the time to spend the time to do it, as they clearly saw the value in it. It might be possible for a third party such as yourself to make the necessary wrappers in Mozilla, IE, Konqueror, etc. to demonstrate such a thing working, which would then interest me in seeing what is missing and how it could be hawked to the interested vendors as a desirable standard extension. Short of a plan on how to get agreement and implementation in major browser vendors to adopt it, I do not see myself working on it, just to have it become yet another private extension for Mozilla. IMO, it clearly was the interest by enough browser vendors that was lacking at the end, not the obvious fact that the design was far from complete or proven by anyone. Ray Whitmer rayw@netscape.com
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 12:16:24 UTC