- From: Glenn A. Adams <glenn@xfsi.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:13:43 -0400
- To: "Brad Pettit" <bradp@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-dom@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Pettit [mailto:bradp@microsoft.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:48 AM > To: Glenn A. Adams; www-dom@w3.org > Subject: RE: DOM2 HTML / HTMLTableRowElement / rowIndex > > >>>[Glenn Adams] > >>>I don't think you mean "logical" order, but, rather, "presentation or > display" order. > > I agree that "logical" is not the best word choice. In any case, both IE > and Netscape use that order when indexing rows. > > >>>Overall, I think that the current language is probably the correct > language > > Whether logical, presentation, whatever, existing implementations do not > follow the current language of the spec, but rather this language: "When > determining rowIndex, The ordering of rows is such that THEAD rows are > first, followed by the rows of each TBODY section in document order, > followed lastly by TFOOT rows." OK. This definition of ordering is well-defined and doesn't refer to document order or presentation order, so I concur with the proposed change if it is cast in this language. Regards, Glenn Adams
Received on Saturday, 21 September 2002 12:09:12 UTC