- From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:51:04 -0400
- To: "Brad Pettit" <bradp@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-dom@w3.org>
>In order to be DOM-compliant, are prevValueArg, newValueArg and attrNameArg >required to be non-null for those MutationEvent types for which they apply? Yes. >It seems like supporting this requirement for prevValue could degrade >overall UA performance In general mutation events are a performance challenge simply because they're so pervasive and uncontrolled. You can do some things with partially deferred computation, or with suppressing events unless there are active listeners; I believe Xerces' implementation demonstrates a few simple ideas along those lines. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 15:51:49 UTC