- From: Arnold, Curt <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:25:18 -0600
- To: www-dom@w3.org
I haven't seen anything in the public thread that looks like a strong vendor or platform bias. Maybe it is there within WG confidential threads, but I haven't seen it here. There were a couple of issues in the previous messages: One was the potential for mice wheels to disappear as an unnecessary appendage. While still possible, the Java platform added a MouseWheelEvent and a MouseWheelListener in JDK 1.4 (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/awt/event/MouseWheelEvent.html). The other was that providing access to hardware specific events was not the way of the future. Capturing any mouse or keyboard event has the potential to upset the users' expectations. In general, most content would not listen to or respond to wheel events and the events would fall through to the user agent's default behavior just like most keystroke or normal mouse events. However, some content benefits greatly by responding to a few select low-level mouse or keystroke events. As an outside observer, it would seem to be an opportune time to add support for wheel events. It does not appear to need any changes to the infrastructure, just the assignment of an event name and description of the expected values for MouseEvent.detail and a few other key members of MouseEvent. I don't expect that the lack of visibility of mouse wheel events would make somebody switch from SVG or HTML to another technology, but getting access to mouse wheel events does seem to be a legitimate desire.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 19:23:59 UTC