- From: Neil Laurance <neil_laurance@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:39:00 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>, www-dom@w3.org
--- Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: > > >getBrowserType(); // some function to determine browser type based on > > >navigator object > > Which is an utterly prepostrous idea that leads to nothing but errors, > and severe barriers of entry to new browser, who either have to spoof > their user agent string (as Opera does.) or not have support for legacy > content. Please do not promote this stupid technique and complain to > anyone who does, object detection is the appropriate method, it's more > reliable now and supports future browsers which browser detection > doesn't. Jim. Could you elucidate what you mean by 'object detection'. I am not familiar with this term. I am all for browser-neutral code, but my my example was merely to illustrate that that we're not all out of a job and can continue to code, no matter what the objects are named by a vendor :). And in most cases the vendors use the same convention. Cheers, Neil ===== +44 7866 462220 (mobile) neil_laurance@yahoo.co.uk (mobile) neil_laurance@adc.com (work) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 9 November 2001 09:39:07 UTC