RE: hasFeature continued

>   For the second sentence, why not:
> 	If the version is an empty string or null, supporting any
> 	version of the feature causes the method to return true.
>   This expresses the possible values in terms of IDL; if the IDL
> mapping for a language doesn't support the null value, there's no
> loss, and there's no need for convoluted language in the general
> portion of the specification.

Maybe "null string" instead of "null".  ECMAScript has the concept of null, it just isn't in the value space of string.

Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 17:36:19 UTC