- From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:58:24 -0500
- To: www-dom@w3c.org
>Too bad the liveness requirement makes performance such a problem, >but that's a different story... We invested a huge amount of effort in making NodeIterator's liveness overhead as lightweight as possible, consonant with the goal of giving it the desired "maintain relative position" navigation semantics. It should be significantly better than NodeList. If that's still too much overhead, and you can live with "current node" navigation semantics, TreeWalker should be about as lightweight as you can get. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2001 09:58:32 UTC