- From: Ray Whitmer <rayw@netscape.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:37:33 -0800
- To: Paolo Casarini <casarini@CS.UniBO.IT>
- CC: www-dom@w3.org
Paolo Casarini wrote: > With an xml element like this: > > <TEST xmlns:pippo="urn:ex.ex.ex" FOO="bar" pippo:CIPPO="lippo" /> > > if I call on the TEST element object the method getAttributeNode("FOO") I > get the attribute object of FOO, if I call the > getAttributeNodeNS("urn:ex.ex.ex","CIPPO") I get the attribute object of > CIPPO, > but if I call getAttributeNode("CIPPO") I should get CIPPO Attribute > Object or NULL? Assume a level 2 aware parser which created the pippo:CIPPO attribute with both namespaceURI and prefix, enabling it to be compatible with both level 1 and level 2 NS calls. In this case, I believe: getAttributeNode("CIPPO") returns a null, whereas getAttributeNode("pippo:CIPPO") returns the CIPPO attribute object, enabling level 1 applications which passed in a qualified name to the old style methods to continue to work as they did with level 1 DOMs which completely ignored the prefix and treated it as part of the name. If, on the other hand, the attribute were created by a level 2 application which did not bother to set the prefix because it knew that the serializer would fix it all in the end, then: getAttributeNode("CIPPO") returns the CIPPO attribute object getAttributeNode("pippo:CIPPO") returns nothing because by manipulating the document using level 2 methods (without bothering to set prefixes, as a parser would) the application forfeits the ability to be compatible with level 1 calls that were effectively superceded by level 2 NS methods. That's the way I understand it, anyway. Ray Whitmer rayw@netscape.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2001 06:32:41 UTC