- From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:19:46 -0400
- To: <www-dom@w3.org>
>> If false, those children and their descendants will be rejected." >I could be nitpicking here, but really says that all decendants of entity >references should be FILTER_REJECTed. Clearer... though since "Rejected" and "skipped" are defined terms in this chapter, I'm not sure that's a problem. > If false, the entity reference will appear to have no children." ... Hm. You're right; as with other filtering it happens at the point where navigation actually occurs, and if you explicitly do a setLocation you may jump past that. But I really do want to use the terminology we've already established in the chapter, so folks can see how expandEntityReferences compares to and interacts with other kinds of filtering. So I'd prefer: If false, those children will be rejected. or, if it really needs the detail: If false, those children will not be visible (as if blocked by FILTER_REJECT). But note that the NodeIterator's documentation does use the terms "skip" and "reject" later in the same paragraph, so there's already a presumption that readers understand what they mean. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2001 11:20:39 UTC