- From: Gavin Stokes <gavin@AmbitiousProductions.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:43:19 -0700
- To: W3C DOM mailing list <www-dom@w3.org>
Thanks to all for the responses. I just want to be able to pass empty elements into subroutines, have them filled (including tag), and then add the resulting elements to an XML doc. Not being able to change the tag will make it harder to break the code into tidy routines that take a C++ object and and turn it into an element. Let's say I have a bunch of overloaded methods in an XML generator called ObjectToXML(const ClassName&, DOM_Element*). I'd simply like to set the tag to be the class name. Because this same type of object may be stored at various levels and places in one XML document, passing the entire document itself is not attractive. The subroutine should not have any knowledge of where the resulting XML is going in the big document. It would be nice to build elements individually at the behest of a higher-level routine, which would be assembling them into the document. Of course, I don't know the inner workings of element-generation as some of you do, so if they're actually different classes generated at runtime then maybe what I want is impractical. Regards, Gavin
Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 18:42:12 UTC