- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:55:00 -0400
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
Daniel Glazman wrote: > You gave yourself the answer : for an editor, the CSS OM lacks a lot (I > mean, really a lot) of things. Permitting multiple instances on the same property in a rule will mislead the CSS author. He will never be able to use them with a CSS engine. So I'm still wondering how useful it is to represent them in the CSS OM except for round-tripping. Regarding CSS comments, there is still an open issue in our list but there is no real advocate for them (the CSS WG would be a good advocate). In the meantime, I would suggest to have a look at the SAC proposal: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SAC-20000728/ Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 10:55:01 UTC