- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:16:38 -0500
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
I think perhaps then, the terminology could be clarified. When I see a link on a document that says "latest version", I read that as the *latest version of the document I'm currently looking at*, whether it be a draft, CR, PR, or Rec. If it's to point back to the latest *Rec*, that should be specified. (I further think the term and linking habits are managed differently across working groups, leading to some of the confusion) Best, Ann t 08:35 PM 12/7/00 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >Ann Navarro wrote: > > > > The "latest version" link points back to the 1st edition Rec, not the > > latest version of the working draft for 2nd Edition. > >And this is normal. The DOM Level 1 REC is still the latest version of >DOM Level 1. Don't make any expectations on the second edition of DOM >Level 1 at that stage. > >Philippe --- Ann Navarro, Author and Chief Geek WebGeek, Inc. http://www.webgeek.com Now Available! - XHTML By Example - http://www.webgeek.com/books/xhtmlbyexample/
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 11:16:25 UTC