- From: Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:09:46 -0400
- To: "Jamshed Ahsan" <ahsanjamshed@rediffmail.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Personal opinion: If you implement org.w3c.dom.HTMLDocument, you really should implement the factory methods properly, which means implementing all the other DOM classes -- otherwise I think you're misleading the user. Of course you do have the option of implementing only some of the additional methods and only claiming to be a normal org.w3c.dom.Document "with additions"; that might be a good compromise. "Complete DOM0 support" is not well defined, since different browsers had different DHTML features. There seems to have been some interest recently in coming up with such a definition; the video industry's TVWEB project has something they're calling DOMT which attempts to describe that space, for example, and we've talked to them a bit about that as a sanity-check. Certainly DOM Level 1 was intended to be compatable with previous practice, but depending on how you define DOM0 you may need the HTML DOM and/or some way of supporting events (ours or roll-your-own) and/or other features that the W3C DOM hasn't yet addressed. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Friday, 6 October 2000 09:10:00 UTC