- From: John Ky <hand@syd.speednet.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:38:32 +1000
- To: <www-dom@w3.org>
I believe there is an issue with cancellable events. The problem here is that event listeners might be written such that they are sensitive to whether the event it responds to was cancelled or not. It would be nice to be able to assume that I can write an event listener with the certainty that: 1. if my event listener gets executed, then the default action of the associated event gets executed. 2. if my event listener gets executed, then it can perform tasks that are consistent with other event listeners on the same event target or later event targets. At the moment my event listener can be executed while a sibling calls preventDefault(); + stopPropagation(); I would much prefer that events where dispatched in two phases. Phase 0 - all events are cancellable Phase 1 - no events are cancellable That is, a cancellable event would only be dispatched in phase 0 and a non-cancellable event would only be dispached on phase 1. All phase 0 dispatches are performed before any phase 1 dispatches. If the any events are cancelled in phase 0, then the phase 1 dispatched is not performed. So when a event listener cancels an event in phase 0, my event listener waiting on phase 1 can safely assume it won't get called. Thanks -John
Received on Monday, 25 September 2000 04:39:21 UTC