- From: Glenn Adams <gadams@vgi.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:08:02 -0700
- To: <Sam.Christiansen@trilogy.com>
- Cc: <www-dom@w3.org>
My reading of this text, to use your example, is that: buttonElt.setAttribute ( "onclick", "alert('foo')" ); can be implemented as (assuming that buttonElt instanceof EventTarget == true): buttonElt.addEventListener ( "click", new Function ( "e", "alert('foo')" ), false ); However, this seems problematic to me: if an implementation is free to implement setAttribute in this manner, then would this support standard attribute semantics; i.e., what would getAttribute() return after setAttribute()? Or does this text say "in addition to setting an attribute recognized to represent an event handler, that implementors may/should/must (?) *also* create and register an equivalent EventListener on the node"? Regards, Glenn Adams ----- Original Message ----- From: <Sam.Christiansen@trilogy.com> To: <www-dom@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 8:52 AM Subject: DOM 2 Event question... > > In mainting compatibility with HTML 4.0 event listeners, the spec says: > > "In order to achieve compatibility with HTML 4.0, implementors may view the > settings of attributes which represent event handlers as the creation and > registration of an EventListener on the Node. The value of useCapture > defaults to false. This EventListener behaves in the same manner as any > other EventListeners which may be registered on the EventTarget." > > If the EventListener behaves in the same manner as any other EventListener, > then is the attribute which represents the event handler expected to point > to an object inmplementing the EventTarget interface (as opposed to a > function)? > > ie, in HTML 4.0, I just put: <BUTTON onclick="alert('foo')"> > > with the new DOM 2 spec, would it look something like this? > > <BUTTON onclick="myEventHandler"> > > where 'myEventHandler' implements the event target interface? This isn't > backwards compatibility, and I just want to make sure that I understand the > spec correctly. > > Thanks, > > Sam Christiansen > Trilogy Software > >
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2000 14:03:49 UTC