- From: Michael Champion <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:44:03 -0400
- To: <www-dom@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com> To: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>; <www-dom@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 2:20 PM Subject: RE: XSL Pattern Queries (values & filters) with DOM > Why wait for XQL when we already have an incredibly powerful addressing > language in place - XPath 1.0. Just to be pedantically correct ;~) "XQL" generally means the proposal put forth by several companies in 1997 in a W3C Note; this basic syntax was used in XPath and XSL Patterns, with some modifications. The eventual product of the W3C XML Query Language Working Group doesn't have a name yet, but "XQL" will probably *not* be it. It is likely to somehow incorporate XPath, but have considerably more power. I happen to agree that XPath would be a useful basis for a couple of DOM Level 3 Core methods, e.g. NodeList getElementsByXPath(DOMString xpathExpression) and a NodeIterator and TreeIterator constructor that takes an XPath expression. This idea had just about ZERO support last summer when the basic Level 3 agenda was discussed, so if you care about this you'll have to lobby hard for it.
Received on Saturday, 15 April 2000 14:45:16 UTC