- From: mark novak <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:46:24 -0500
- To: www-dom@w3.org
hi I'm reading the draft DOM 2 spec., 19990304, and i'm trying to understand some things, and i'm wondering if i'm thinking of problems or not. My questions center around the idea of DOM being, as defined, a platform and language neutral interface. For example, in UIEvent interface, there are attributes for screen location and a specified group of modifier keys. Does screen location imply a visual platform with mouse? Do the modifier keys define the PC platform, since I did not see Apple's "command" key, or the common "meta" key in X Window. Maybe the wording makes me think "specificity" when it is intended to be more general? Am I wrong in thinking that i'd like to see UIEvent interface more generic, and then perhaps as an extension to DOM, inherit and apply specific platform attributes? Likewise, my same line of thought would apply to almost all of the UI Events, from click, dblclick, ... keydown, keyup. Again, i'm thinking more along the idea of a generic input and perhaps a generic output event model/syntax, that each of these what I'd call "PC" ("PC" = pc windows, pc mac, pc X, etc..) events could be inherited from, in some kind of platform specific DOM extension(s). I guess I don't see how the DOM stays platform neutral if it defines all these what appear to be "PC" UI Events, and within this draft, very pc windows leaning ? thanks mark
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 1999 10:47:01 UTC