- From: ANOQ of the Sun <anoq@vip.cybercity.dk>
- Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 17:23:02 +0200
- To: titto@essex.ac.uk, www-dom@w3.org
"Pasqualino \"Titto\" Assini" wrote: > As you implemented a CORBA DOM implementation you are probably the best person > to ask. Actually there are people on this list who have far more complete DOMimplementations than mine and people who knows DOM much better than me, but thanks for your confidence ;) > Did you try to access a sizable XML document across the Internet and, for > example, print it ? You mean though the DOM API? Nope. The implementation is not eventested yet, and I don't have access to make such a setup by myself. However we were discussing to do network tests with CORBA in the Berlin-project later on. > It would be interesting to know how would that compare with: > - zipping the document on the server > - dowloading it on the client > - reparsing and printing it Sorry, no idea... > > > A related question, is there any proposal for a protocol between a DOM > > > implementation and an underlying datastore ? > > I'm sorry but I don't understand, IIOP is an inter-ORB protocol, used to carry > CORBA calls. > What has it to do with a DOM to DB interface ? I guess I just misunderstood what you meat. IIOP can send CORBA callsacross a network from an interface (DOM) client to an implementation (possibly a DB). So there's a protcol... > What I was thinking was some kind of "minimal DOM interface" on which the whole > DOM could be implemented. > > A DB vendor should support only this minimal set, so making porting DOM to a > range to DBs easier. > > Does it make any sense ? Yup, now I understand it completely different - but I don't know aboutthis. That is for the DOM workgroup to decide I guess. Cheers -- val it = ("ÁNOQ of the Sun", "Johnny Andersen", ["anoq@vip.cybercity.dk", "anoq@berlin-consortium.org"], "http://users.cybercity.dk/~ccc25861/") : cyberspacename * meatspacename * email list * homepage URL
Received on Thursday, 8 October 1998 12:33:28 UTC