- From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 01:20:35 -0400
- To: www-dom@w3.org
> ...enumeration of 24000 elements took 200 milliseconds using > item() and 220 milliseconds using getNextSibling(). I think my implementation probably runs both pretty quickly... EXCEPT when "liveness" becomes an issue, at which point losing the cached info blows one out of the water. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 1998 01:30:09 UTC