- From: Stephen R. Savitzky <steve@crc.ricoh.com>
- Date: 27 Jul 1998 16:45:09 -0700
- To: www-dom@w3.org
The DOM specification states:
parentNode
The parent of the given Node instance. All nodes, except
Documents and DocumentFragments, have a parent. If a node has
just been created and not yet added to the tree, it has an
implicit parent which is a DocumentFragment.
This strikes me as misguided. Surely it's better for a newly-created Node
to have a null parent. Otherwise, the process of creating a Node and adding
it to a tree consists of:
creating a new DocumentFragment
creating the Node.
adding the new Node to the DocumentFragment's children
removing the new Node from the DocumentFragment's children
adding the new Node to the tree in the correct place
... at which point we probably have no references remaining to the
DocumentFragment, so it hangs around taking up space until the garbage
collector scavenges it.
Of course, the DocumentFragment in question could be effectively a freelist,
but why constrain the implementation, and wouldn't a NodeList be more
appropriate for the purpose?
It looks as if there was a point in the spec's evolution where somebody
attempted to replace NodeList with DocumentFragment.
--
Stephen R. Savitzky Chief Software Scientist, Ricoh Silicon Valley, Inc.,
<steve@rsv.ricoh.com> California Research Center
voice: 650.496.5710 fax: 650.854.8740 URL: http://rsv.ricoh.com/~steve/
home: <steve@starport.com> URL: http://www.starport.com/people/steve/
Received on Monday, 27 July 1998 20:59:24 UTC