- From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@eps.inso.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 09:29:47 -0700
- To: "Stephen R. Savitzky" <steve@crc.ricoh.com>, <www-dom@w3.org>
> o I'm very sorry to see NodeIterator, TreeIterator, and their create methods > disappear. It's easier to create iterators when you know the type (and > hence the implementation details) of the objects you're iterating over; > the resulting type-specific iterator can much more efficient than a > generic one, and its class need not be exposed to the programmer. Iterators will probably come back in the next level of the specification. > Finally, I note that there are no comments in the Java bindings. > While this is well-optimized for the appendix to the specification, it would > be best if the compiled version (javabindings.zip) had the comments, so that JavaDoc > and other documentation-extraction and source-code-browsing software could > make use of them. Good point! When I have time I'll tweak the scripts to generate the descriptions as comments.
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 1998 09:32:00 UTC