- From: Antoine Bertier <antoine.bertier@axa.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 10:09:23 +0200
- To: www-dom@w3.org
Thanks for the answers! I am eargerly expecting the next public draft. In the current draft DOM HTML 1 the id attribute is not described in the text, it just appears in the IDL. Regards, Antoine. Lauren Wood wrote: > At 30/06/98 06:14 AM , Antoine Bertier wrote: > >Hello everybody, > > > >I am trying to understandand how the DOM provides named access to > >elements, at least HTML elements but why not to core elements too. > > It's more difficult for Core elements, since something called "ID" may not > in fact be one, and something with another name may be an ID. So we have to > come up with a generalised method. We will be doing this after Level 1 is out. > > >The IDL for HTMLElement specifies an 'id' attribute, which I assumes > >has the same semantics as the HTML 4.0 ID attribute. For the IMG element > >specifies a 'name' attribute for compatibility reasons. > > Yes, the id attribute is the ID attribute - HTML does not have > case-sensitivity. > > >I see the images() methods to get a NamedNodeList which I assumes allows > >to find an IMG element by its 'name' attribute or by its 'id' > >attribute... The same goes for applets, links, forms and anchors. > > Yes. > > >However since all elements have an ID in HTML 4.0 I expect to be able to > >access any element by its document wide ID (DIV elements for instance). > >How do I do that ? > > This is currently being discussed in the DOM WG and there will be a method > in the next public draft to access elements by their unique ID. > > Lauren
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 1998 04:14:29 UTC