Re: Comments about the Java DOM interfaces

Mark L. Fussell wrote:
> The following are some comments on the Java DOM interfaces and some
> [...]
> OccurrenceType should be an interface and not a class.  Otherwise you

Could you indicate what's your reference document ?
I use the DOM level-one-971009 and I didn't find "OccurrenceType".
Thank you for your help. :-)
 
> All the inner classes should have 'static' in front of the 'class' as

idem. I don't find classes and even less the inner classes.

> 
> [...] 
> Larger/Less-likely Functionality Suggestions
> --------------------------------------------
> There seems to be a number of inconsistencies between the DOM and the
> Grove model.  It would seem these two should be more fully aligned.

I agree.

Regards,

Laurent ROUVET.

Received on Monday, 29 December 1997 17:28:30 UTC