- From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 11:31:09 -0500
- To: www-dom@w3.org
Hello. I have a question about what DOM has to say about the validity of the documents represented using DOM. It seems to me that objects comprising DOM map isomorphically into the elements comprising an XML document. Given that validity is defined for an XML document, it should be possible to define validity for a DOM document through this mapping. Such a definition would likely be intuitive and directly derivable from the XML definition. The DOM (Core) Level 1 draft says that issues of document "validation" are being deferred to subsequent DOM levels. I'm wondering if anyone can answer the following questions for me: (1) Does the term "validation" in the Level 1 draft refer to ensuring document validity, where validity is defined by derivation as I have suggested above? If not I'm curious to know what it refers to or whether the whole notion is still being left open (and what it might entail). (2) If for purposes of this question we do define validity as I suggest above, what does DOM have to say about the validity of DOM documents? In particular, I'd like to know the degree to which DOM allows for the creation of invalid documents and what DOM interface operations require that validity be preserved. (An answer the the first question will probably also answer the second question.) Thanks for your help, and I apologize in advance if these concerns have been covered elsewhere. -- Joe Lapp (Java Apps Developer/Consultant) Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org jlapp@acm.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 1997 11:30:06 UTC