- From: Yung-Fong Tang <ftang@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:40:53 -0700
- To: www-dom@w3.org, erik@netscape.com
- Message-ID: <342B12A5.117E3579@netscape.com>
1. in the IDL issues section > For more information on OMG's IDL, please visit the OMG > home page, or download the CORBA 2.0 specification (it's > rather large) which contains the IDL language definition in > chapter 3. Suggest to change to COBRA 2.1 since it have better International support. 2. Some interface refer to String and some refer to string. I suggest we clean up this. 3. Document class: Should the NodeList epilog move to XMLDocument if epilog is not exist in HTML ? 4. HTMLDocument: should we add method to get NodeEnumerator of FRAME , StyleSheet, (Layer) ? 5. Node: getLeftSibling() and getRightSibling().... These two names are very Western (left to right) centric- Could we change to a bettern name which do not imply left come before right ? Should it be getPreviousSibling() and getNextSilbing() ? 6. NodeList: Node getNth(in unsigned long index): Should we clearly state it is 0 base index or 1 base index. 7. PI: This class name is a little bit strang. All the rest of the class are not abbreviate, only this class are abbreviate as PI. Should it be ProcessingInstruction to make the class naming convenition more consistence ? 8. UcChar, UcString: Do we still need those classes ? (I assume all String should be UcString already ... Maybe I am wrong). If we use Cobra 2.1, we may use wstring.... 9. Character: As someone answer me eariler, this classes will be deleted , right ?
Received on Thursday, 25 September 1997 21:41:36 UTC