- From: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus <Scott_Boag@lotus.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 14:28:09 -0400
- To: www-dom-xpath@w3.org
I would propose that we create three rough competing proposals for a DOM XPath: 1) Ultra Minimal (e.g. Microsoft/Oracle selectNodes as they exist today). 2) Minimal but with separate interface+namespace context support. 3) Complete as makes sense (e.g. full context initialization, variable support, maybe matching, maybe compiled queries, etc.) Then we can vote on which one we want to converge on. If, as is probable, we decide on 1) or 2), we can use 3) as a potential long range plan, and try to see if there can be a continuum from at 1) or 2) to 3). I would be glad to work with someone on either 2) or 3) (preferably 3). -scott
Received on Sunday, 7 May 2000 14:27:44 UTC