- From: Michael Champion <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:55:57 -0400
- To: "Www-Dom-Xpath@W3. Org" <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@virgin.net> To: "Www-Dom-Xpath@W3. Org" <www-dom-xpath@w3.org> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 2:59 PM Subject: RE: nasty namespace issue (was RE: Is minimalism a goal?) My personal feeling about this (and most development projects!) is to start simple, release early and often, make SURE that the simple stuff works, then tackle the harder stuff. We *know* the dirt-simple MS API works (sorta); I think we should get just a LITTLE more ambitious in the first iteration, then keep getting more and more complex/conformant/powerful until we come to the point of diminishing returns. So, I'd pose the question: "What's the next step beyond selectNodes() that we can agree on as useful? Is there some tweak for namespace awareness that we can add ... or should we address the context issue first, the variable binding issue first, or what? Is anyone comfortable with this approach? Mike
Received on Friday, 5 May 2000 15:56:38 UTC