- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:09:06 +0200
- To: David Faure <david@mandrakesoft.com>
- Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
comments inlined On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 05:58 PM, David Faure wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for the minutes of the telephone conference. > I didn't know it would include specific discussion on specific tests... > If possible I'd like to be part of the next telephone conference then. > [dd] absolutely, I think I did send an agenda covering the issues we would go through to the mailing list. > For now I would like to comment on the following issue: > >> 17. file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test- >> Suite/build/level2/html/ecmascript/tests/HTMLPreElement01.ht >> >> Comment: The width attribute specifies the fixed width for >> content. Retrieve the width attribute and examine it's value. >> >> Johnny: The spec says pre.width is an unsigned long, but IE returns it >> as a string??? >> >> "widthLink" >> Expected 277 (number) but was 277 (string) >> >> Johnny: I'm happy be to say that this should get back to a string even >> if it doesn't make sense... Netscape didn't expose the pre in NS3. >> >> -> change > > Does this mean you are going to change the test to match IE's broken > behaviour? > Both Mozilla and Konqueror return it as a number, as the spec says. > Shouldn't this be flagged as an IE bug instead? > [I don't understand the comment about NS3...] > > For the rest I'm happy to see that IE has more failures on the test > than the current Konqueror (down to 31 failures right now, and still > working on it) :-) > > Thanks, > David. >
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 12:09:07 UTC