- From: Jeroen van Rotterdam <jeroen@x-hive.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:58:11 +0200
- To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2001 05:55:06 UTC
Hi, Looking at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2001Mar/0023.html Is this the latest publication on the dtd by the way ? The following constructs makes it more difficult to convert existing tests e.g. in Java to the dtd. <!ENTITY lastChild "getLastChild"> <!ENTITY lastChild_Type "Node"> <call name="&lastChild;" type="&lastChild_Type;" /> A couple of questions: 1. Why do we use entities for method names ? Why not just: <call name="getLastChild" type="Node"/> 2. If you use entities than the return type is already know so a simple: <call name="&getLastChild;"/> would do ? 3. What will happen with private methods will they be defined in terms of entities. It seems to me that a generic approach for dom methods and private methods has it advantages Jeroen
Received on Monday, 30 April 2001 05:55:06 UTC