- From: Jos De Roo <josderoo@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 22:06:16 +0200
- To: www-archive@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJbsTZf5Lt2GhJfdkXdfPY61_EG6KXrpGObrnKmEhov_2t_WPA@mail.gmail.com>
Since I started implementing N3 reasoning in 2001 the scope of quickvars is the statement (i.e. triple or rule) level. This is because I follow the logic programming convention where the scope of universals is the clause (i.e. fact or rule). At the occasion of the first team submission d.d. 2008-01-14 http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-n3-20080114/ I made the following comments 5 days later http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2008JanMar/0000.html esp. [[ The main differences that we have in our implementation are 1/ the scope of quickvars like ?A is the statement level ... ]] Then 7 years later (2015) I replied to a message from TimBL https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-talk/2015JanMar/0003.html but never got a reply back. Then another 7 years later (2022) I created the following issue https://github.com/solid/specification/issues/395#issue-1197903204 Jos -- https://josd.github.io
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2022 20:07:40 UTC