Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, 2017-03-13 07:54 -0400: > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8b4b7e4a-5b96-0a94-a29b-818e755f7e0d@w3.org> > On 3/12/2017 3:39 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: > > I’ve added to the draft the following explicit statement of CR exit criteria: > > > > > This specification’s CR exit criteria are that, before requesting > > > transition to PR/Rec, the group will, through a (yet to be developed) > > > implementation report, demonstrate adequate implementation experience > > > for the specification. > > That's a little vague. What would qualify as enough adequate implementation > experience? I’ve changed it to say this: > This Candidate Recommendation will have met its CR exit criteria when there > are at least two interoperable implementations of each feature in the spec, as > demonstrated in a (yet to be developed) implementation report. -- Michael[tm] Smith https://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:29:16 UTC