- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 16:42:12 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
We are using shex (instead of shacl) because of its terseness in its compact syntax. We find the brevity helpful for human comprehension. Thanks, David Booth On 05/31/2017 12:54 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > A colleague says, "I think I want to use something like SHACL or ShEx. I > hear you know this stuff. I don't care about whether something is > endorsed by W3C and I don't know how they work. I just want whatever > will work best for me. Which should I use?" > > If your answer starts with "It depends...", then please send it to me, > off-list. If you're ok with your response being public, keep the CC > www-archive. If you're okay with your text being used anonymously, > please say so. If your answer is just "ShEx" or "SHACL", then thanks, > but that's not useful for me right now. > > I say "off-list" because I expect on-list replies to be > counter-productive at this point. > > I'll summarize back to the list. > > Thanks, everyone. > > -- Sandro > > > >
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 20:42:46 UTC