So it isn't missing anything that you know of? Also, if you could help find the "shoulds" that should be parameters, and have any suggestions for naming, that would be great. Mark On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Mark Davis ⚖ <markdavis@google.com> > wrote: > > I put together a working doc (https://goo.gl/Kqvpfh) for producing a > > proposal for the upcoming UTC meeting. Could you look it over to make > sure > > that I've captured each of the issues? > > > > And any comments you have on the suggested disposition are welcome! The > doc > > is shared for comments, so you can either leave sidebar comments or add > > suggested text (going into "Suggest Mode" at the top right). > > Thank you, that document looks great. I think those improvements will > help a lot. And then hopefully once we get more tests going and the > remaining browsers switch to Nontransitional_Processing (Chrome and > Edge to go) this will all be a little more stable once again. (And I > suspect there might then be some further feedback, baby steps.) > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 10:33:55 UTC